Legal Opinion
Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of Beaumont
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 30, 2005No. 03-1461 RT (SGLX)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF.BEAUMONT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 12(b)(6); and (2) DISMISSING THIS ACTION.
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered defendant City of Beaumont (“City”)’s motion to dismiss the complaint - of plaintiffs Outdoor Media Group, Inc., and Chance Outdoor, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)s’ pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”), Plaintiffs’ opposition, and City’s reply. Based on such consideration, the court concludes as follows:
I
BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Covenant Media of California, L.LC. v. City of Huntington ParkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Covenant Media of Illinois, L.L.C. v. City of Des PlainesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010