Legal Opinion

Universal Lightning Rod, Inc. v. Rischall Electric

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 27, 1963No. File No. CV 14-627-9537PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action, brought against the defendant Harold M. Rischall, seeking to hold him personally liable on a promissory note, in the amount of $590, which is dated April 9, 1962. The question presented is whether he is liable personally on the note. He signed the note in manner and form as follows: "Rischall Electric Co., Inc., [and under this designation] Harold M. Rischall."

The Rischall Electric Company, Inc., was a corporation which had been in business for more than twenty years. In the course of its business, certain lightning rods were ordered from the plaintiff in order to fill a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GrossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Didriksen v. HavensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Meyers v. MaglarisConnecticut Superior Court · 1947
  4. Proctor v. BaubySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plemens v. Diddeglaser, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. In Re Key Book Service, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
  3. Wurzburg Bros., Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Ristvedt v. NettumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API