Legal Opinion
Perigot v. Steiker
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 13, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
18 N.J. Super. 134 (1952)
86 A.2d 788
CHARLES PERIGOT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JACOB STEIKER, MEYER STEIKER, DEFENDANTS, AND SYDNEY STEIKER, TRADING AS STEIKER MOTORS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 28, 1952.
Decided February 13, 1952.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and Wm.J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph J. De Luccia, on the brief).
Mr. Stephen Mongiello argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.
A course of common events sometimes produces an aspect of legal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fivey v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Mueller v. Seaboard Commercial Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LodzinskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Mesce v. Automobile Association of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- N. Rothenberg & Son, Inc. v. NakoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Colucci v. ColucciNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991