Legal Opinion · Dissent

Juliano v. Strong

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1982No. 858Published

1DissentBrosky, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Appellant, Mabel Strong, petitioned the trial court to open a judgment ordering Ms. Strong’s eviction entered after a hearing before a District Justice. The trial court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to open the judgment. The parties then entered into what appears to be a consent order signed by John Juliano, the landlord, and William M. Parker, a social worker who assisted Ms. Strong.1 This appeal is made from the consent agreement which was entered into in the trial court. Appellant claims she was wrongfully evicted. She also asserts that the court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DePAUL v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Appeal of Scott TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Klein v. Allegheny County Health DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. In re Appeal of NewlandCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API