Gainey v. Local 71, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPaRicee, J.
This is a summary of the parts of plaintiffs’ complaint necessary for decision:
The 21 plaintiffs are now over-the-road drivers and employees of Akers Motor Lines, Inc., a common carrier by truck of commodities in interstate commerce — hereafter called Akers. Originally there were 28 plaintiffs, but Dan W. Martin and six others have removed themselves as plaintiffs, as they are no longer employees of Akers. Plaintiffs, as a group, constitute some of the oldest drivers in point of service with Akers.
The employees of Akers, including the 21 plaintiffs, have been unionized and represented for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Lockridge v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Electric Railway & Motor Coach EmployeesIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Poole v. Local 305 National Post Office Mail HandlersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Lockridge v. AMALGAMATED ASS'N OF ST. ER & MC EMP.Idaho Supreme Court · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961