Legal Opinion

Gainey v. Local 71, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1960No. 240PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaRicee, J.

This is a summary of the parts of plaintiffs’ complaint necessary for decision:

The 21 plaintiffs are now over-the-road drivers and employees of Akers Motor Lines, Inc., a common carrier by truck of commodities in interstate commerce — hereafter called Akers. Originally there were 28 plaintiffs, but Dan W. Martin and six others have removed themselves as plaintiffs, as they are no longer employees of Akers. Plaintiffs, as a group, constitute some of the oldest drivers in point of service with Akers.

The employees of Akers, including the 21 plaintiffs, have been unionized and represented for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Lockridge v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Electric Railway & Motor Coach EmployeesIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Poole v. Local 305 National Post Office Mail HandlersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Lockridge v. AMALGAMATED ASS'N OF ST. ER & MC EMP.Idaho Supreme Court · 1962
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API