Legal Opinion

Matheisel v. County of Hillsborough

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 30, 1970No. 5936Published

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was a county welfare recipient for about a year prior to this action. He petitioned the superior court to have his allotment increased, claiming that he was unable to exist on the $8.00 a week allowance for food and that he was in dire need of clothing. On August 26, 1968, after a hearing on a report of the Probation Department, to which the matter had been referred, the Court (Keller, J.) found plaintiff to be a county pauper unable to support himself and that the amount being paid him was “unreasonably insufficient ” to properly sustain him and that the county had unreasonably…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Wheeler v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. County of Hillsborough v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. Salisbury v. Merrimack CountySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API