Matheisel v. County of Hillsborough
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The plaintiff was a county welfare recipient for about a year prior to this action. He petitioned the superior court to have his allotment increased, claiming that he was unable to exist on the $8.00 a week allowance for food and that he was in dire need of clothing. On August 26, 1968, after a hearing on a report of the Probation Department, to which the matter had been referred, the Court (Keller, J.) found plaintiff to be a county pauper unable to support himself and that the amount being paid him was “unreasonably insufficient ” to properly sustain him and that the county had unreasonably…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wheeler v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- County of Hillsborough v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Salisbury v. Merrimack CountySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.