Legal Opinion

Place v. Place

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1905No. Docket No. 108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Oceana; Russell, J. Ejectment by Hiram B. Place against Elizabeth Moe Place. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

The parties to this suit were formerly husband and wife. September 36, 1887, plaintiff obtained a divorce from defendant on the ground of desertion. Prior to 1885 the property in controversy was occupied by these parties as their homestead. Since that time defendant has resided thereon, and plaintiff has resided else*510where. The legal title is in plaintiff, and on the 21st day of July, 1903, he commenced this suit in ejectment to recover possession. Defendant claims to have acquired title by adverse possession. Whether she had so acquired title constitutes the sole issue in this case.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warner v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Harding v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  3. Kinsey v. KinseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Shrock v. ShrockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
  5. Bulen v. BurroughsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Taggart v. TiskaMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API