Pittman v. Pittman
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Benton County. This is an appeal from the decree of the court below, dissolving the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, and awarding the custody of the two minor children to the defendant. The plaintiff appeals to this court, and relies upon two assignments of error for reversal of the decree. I. That the court below erred in not finding the defendant (respondent), guilty of adultery. II.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Benton County. This is an appeal from the decree of the court below, dissolving the bonds of matrimony between plaintiff and defendant, and awarding the custody of the two minor children to the defendant. The plaintiff appeals to this court, and relies upon two assignments of error for reversal of the decree. I. That the court below erred in not finding the defendant (respondent), guilty of adultery. II. That the court erred in awarding the custody of the two infants to the defendant (respondent).
1Opinion of the Court
McArthur, J,
In passing upon the points presented in this case, it must be borne in mind, that it was heretofore decided that the statement of facts annexed to the record of the judgment herein, did not meet with the requirements of the law, consequently, it will hot be considered. The case will be determined upon the record; and, as there is *554nothing disclosed by the record to warrant the first assignment of error, we will pass to the consideration of the second.
It is assumed by appellant’s counsel, that inasmuch as the record shows that the defendant was the party at fault,' the court erred…
2Cited by7 opinions
- In the Matter of Marriage of Hruby and HrubyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Boles v. BolesMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Nunn v. BirdOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Edington v. EdingtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Richardson v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.