Legal Opinion

Sun Cal, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1992No. 558-85CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

This government contract action involves a lease and construction contract covering the sixth, seventh, and eighth floors of an office building located in Los Angeles, California. The United States General Service Administration (GSA) terminated the contract for default and never took possession of the property. In a previous decision, this court concluded that the termination for default was improper. Sun Cal, Inc. v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 31 (1990). That decision leaves the government potentially liable for damages. In respective motions, the parties seek…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. William Filene's Sons Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Underhill v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Beall v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Keydata Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  5. Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Koby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Krasne v. Tedeschi & GrassoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Allenfield Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API