I.O. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Judge.
Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent for aggravated assault by use of a shotgun. By this appeal he contends that the court erred in applying a subjective test to find that the instrument used was a deadly weapon where objective proof was lacking. We agree and reverse.
The testimony of the victim, who had twenty-six years military service with the United States Air Force, had an “expert” rifle rating, and was at one time a member of a “Scattergun” team, was that the weapon used by I. 0. was not a toy gun, but a *43real shotgun. I. O. and a companion juvenile testified…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goswick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- M.R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- M. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- In the Interest of T.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Morales v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- O'BRIEN v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.