Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Martiny Lakes Project

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1968No. Calendar No. 6, Docket No. 49,859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

381 Mich. 180 (1968)

160 N.W.2d 909

In re MARTINY LAKES PROJECT.

MECOSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

v.

CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT.

MOORMAN

v.

SAME.

Calendar No. 6, Docket No. 49,859.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided September 25, 1968.

Rehearing denied February 3, 1969.

Robert L. Miles, for plaintiffs.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Nicholas V. Olds and Esther E. Newton, Assistant Attorneys General, for defendant.

Amicus Curiae on application for rehearing: Michigan United Conservation Clubs, by A. Newton Dilley.

BLACK, J.

Case No. 49,859 presents a controlling…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. The MontelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Parks v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Attorney General Ex Rel. Director of Natural Resources v. HalldenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Iosco County Drain Commissioner v. Van Ettan Lake Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Lenawee County Board of Commissioners v. AbrahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API