Legal Opinion

Village of Seneca Falls v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided March 15, 1921No. Claim No. 15789PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mowion to dismiss claim.

1Opinion of the CourtWebb, J.

The claim is for damages alleged to have 1»......- suffered by the claimant by reason of the act, .IT ult and negligence of the state of New York, in the ¡construction, maintenance and operation of the improved Cayuga and Seneca canal at Seneca Falls, whereby a large volume of water in a pool created by the state was precipitated in and upon the claimant’s sewer system and sewage disposal plant at Seneca Falls greatly damaging the same.

The argument on the part of the state was based \ upon the decision of this court in the case of Town of *36New Lebanon v. State of New York, 111 Misc. Rep. 310,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ackert v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. O'Bryan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Little Falls v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Town of Vienna v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API