Legal Opinion

O'Bryan v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided August 15, 1910No. 9650PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Claim against the State for damages. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The claimant’s intestate met his death while driving a traction engine over a State bridge, known *619as the Pecksport bridge, which spans the old Chenango canal now used as a canal feeder in the town of Eaton, Madison county, May 31, 1910.

He was working for the highway commissioner of the town as an engineer and was driving a traction engine, weighing four and one-half tons; and when nearly over the bridge the engine broke through the bridge and claimant’s intestate was killed.

The bridge was built about thirteen years before the accident, was twenty-six and one-half feet long between the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warner v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Kelly v. Town of SaugertiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Little Falls v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Village of Seneca Falls v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API