Legal Opinion

Deming v. Scoville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1930No. 6 Div. 461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellants, for a reversal of the judgment rendered against them in the court below, rest upon the principle of law that where a tenant abandons the possession of the premises before the expiration of his term, and the landlord re-enters and resumes the beneficial use and enjoyment of the premises, he thereby terminates the lease in so fai; as his right to recover subsequently accruing rents is concerned. 16 R. O. L. pp. 970-1; Rice v. Dudley, 65 Ala. 68; Schuisler & Donnell v. Ames, 16 Ala. 73, 50 Am. Dec. 168.

But the principle of these authorities is here inapplicable. The defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. DudleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Schuisler & Donnell v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. Tully v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ryals v. LaneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  2. McClure v. DanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  3. Mark Weaver v. Frios Gourmet Pops, LLC, Frios Manufacturing, LLC, Andy Harp, and Kevin HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API