Legal Opinion

Ryals v. Laney

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1976No. Civ. 869PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

From a judgment awarding $900 in damages by the trial court sitting without a jury, the lessee, Dr. Jarvis Ryals, takes this appeal.

Dr. Ryals, through able counsel, contends that the judgment of the trial court is due to be reversed in that (1) the parties to the lease by their conduct, cancelled the lease; (2) that the lessor failed to sublet the premises for the remainder of the lease; and (3) that, in this instance, by selling the premises prior to the expiration of the lease, Dr. Ryals (lessee) is not liable for a portion of the rent. We find no merit in the above and affirm.

The record…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schuisler & Donnell v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Self v. SelfCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. McClure v. DanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  4. Stathem Ex Rel. Service Fire Insurance v. FerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Cobb v. LeeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sommer v. KridelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Bowdoin Square, LLC v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Crestline Center v. HintonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Ex Parte KaschakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API