Legal Opinion · Dissent

Forman v. Clatsop County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1983No. CC-82-156; CA A24527Published

1DissentRossman, J.

Through a process more akin to alchemy than to analysis, the majority concludes that the creation of LUBA somehow constituted an affirmative grant of primary jurisdiction to local governments to determine the existence of a nonconforming use. That conclusion overrules a series of decisions by this court that local governments have no such power and creates an unnecessary dual system of jurisdiction that I am convinced the legislature did not intend. In my opinion, the majority missed the boat at the outset and still waits at the wrong pier. Accordingly, I dissent.

For the reasons set out…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Eagle Creek Rock Products, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. 1000 Friends v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API