Legal Opinion

Meyncke v. State ex rel. Lines

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From tlie Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint for bastardy. Verdict, guilty; motion for new trial .overruled; motion in arrest of judg*402ment overruled; exception; judgment of affiliation ; order of payments foi’ the support of the child; appeal.

The assignments of error in this court are :

1. Overruling the motion for a new trial; and,

2. Overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.

At the trial, after the prosecutrix had' testified, in chief, that the defendant was the father of her child, the defendant, on cross-examination, after the prosecutrix had stated that she was at Julian T. Meyncke’sonthel9th day of October last, the day…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hill v. GustIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Walker v. State ex rel. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  3. Doe v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  4. City of Aurora v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Rawles v. State ex rel. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Head v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Blough v. ParryIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Reddick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  4. Griffith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Walton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API