Hoover Co. v. Robeson Industries Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to join Carmen Giannini as a party defendant. The Defendants have filed opposition to the motion, and Plaintiff has replied thereto. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed this action for patent and trademark infringement in this Court, alleging that Defendant GSL Industries, Ltd. (“GSL”) has manufactured and sold a vacuum cleaner that infringes on Hoover’s U.S. Patent No. 4,381,685. GSL distributes its product in Ohio through Sears and Wal-Mart stores.
Carm…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Glasstech, Inc. v. TGL Tempering Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- David L. Hildebrand v. Steck Manufacturing Company, Inc., Atc Products, Inc., Cornwell Quality Tools Company, Mac Tools, Matco Tools, Snap-On Tools Company, and Tools USA and Equipment Company, and Lock Technology, Inc. (Also Known as Archer Tools, Casey Tools, and K-C Tools), Steck Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. David L. Hildebrand and H.A. Specialities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Walker v. ConcobyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Ihf Ltd. v. Myra BagDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Beightler v. Produkte Fur Die Medizin AGDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.