Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Breed, Elliot & Harrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1918No. 8926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Complaint; from Floyd superior court — Judge Wright. May 8, 1917. See, ante, 677.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

In 1915 the City of Rome advertised for bids for $75,000 of its bonds. The advertisement described the bonds and fixed the time at which bids would be received, and contained the following provision: “All bidders must accompany their bids with a certified check for five hundred ($500.00) dollars.”' Nothing was said about the purpose for which this certified check was required, nor was any notice given that the deposit would be forfeited in ease of failure to comply with the terms of the bid. The plaintiff, a corporation, made a bid for these bonds, accompanying the same with a certified check…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Yellowstone Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Coler v. CleburneSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Perkins County v. GraffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Cleveland v. City Council of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  5. Wright v. East Riverside Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winer v. Flournoy Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Kenney v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Municipal Securities Corp. v. Buhl Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wehunt v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. National City Co. v. Mayor of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API