Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance Company v. Tungsten Heavy Powder & Parts, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 18, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01197Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FEDERAL INSURANCE Case No.: 21cv1197-W-MDD COMPANY, 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, 13 MOTION TO COMPEL GENERAL v. DYNAMICS’ COMPLIANCE WITH 14 SUBPOENA TUNGSTEN HEAVY POWDER & 15 PARTS, INC. AND TUNGSTEN 16 PARTS WYOMING, INC., [ECF No. 32] 17 Defendants. 18 19 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 20 21 This dispute concerns a Rule 45 subpoena for deposition testimony that 22 Plaintiff served to one of Defendants’ former customers, a nonparty, General 23 Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (“GD-OTS”). On June…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  2. CSS, Inc. v. HerringtonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
  3. Cameron v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Wheeler v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rodco AutobodyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API