Legal Opinion

Boyd v. North

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1921No. 15956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered March 18,1920, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered in favor of plaintiffs, in an action of unlawful detainer, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— By a written indenture of lease, the respondents Boyd leased to the appellant North certain real property situated in the city of Seattle on which there was an apartment building, for a term of years commencing on September 1,1919, and terminating on October 31, 1924. The lease contained a covenant against assignment and covenants against subletting the premises in whole or in part, and provided that, for a breach of any such covenants, the lessors could, at their option, declare a forfeiture of the lease and reenter the premises, either with or without process of law.

Mrs. North, on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Big Bend Land Co. v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. McGrew v. LambWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. HackettWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. ShaugCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. Hughes v. CrowleyWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API