Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Estate of Harvey

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1990No. 17677PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This ease focuses on a juncture between tort law and worker’s compensation law. Gerald Hansen and Robert Lehman have appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their tort action against an employer, Don Harvey, and against the estate of a co-employee, James Harvey. The issue before us is whether the district court correctly determined that Hansen and Lehman were barred from any tort recovery by the exclusive remedy provision of the Idaho worker’s compensation law. We affirm.

The relevant facts are as follows. Gerald Hansen and Robert Lehman were employed by a business known as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eriksen v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Whitlock v. Haney Seed Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Pence v. Idaho State Horse Racing CommissionIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Torres v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Estate of HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Atkinson v. 2M Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Casey v. SevyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Atkinson v. 2M Company, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Casey v. SevyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API