Legal Opinion

United States v. Neil Roger Beidler

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1997No. 96-4290PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge RUSSELL and Judge HERLONG joined.

OPINION

WILKINS, Circuit Judge:

Neil Roger Beidler appeals his conviction and sentence for structuring currency transactions in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324(3) (1988), arguing primarily that the evidence is insufficient to support a conclusion that he willfully violated that provision. We conclude that the evidence establishes that Bei-dler engaged in extensive efforts to conceal his structuring activity and that the evidence of those efforts is sufficient to support an inference…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. William MacPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Jorge CornellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API