Legal Opinion

Horne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 5, 1990No. Nos. 89-2593, 89-2594 and 89-2595PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

2Per curiam

We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, but grant appellee’s motion for clarification, withdraw our opinion filed July 11, 1990 and substitute for it the following:

Appellant, James Wayne Horne, appeals from his sentence as a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988) and from the trial court’s imposition of costs under section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1987). We affirm the sentence but vacate the imposition of costs.

We find no merit in either appellant’s contention that the trial court failed to make the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Eutsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Cox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API