Legal Opinion

Eutsey v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 24, 1980No. 55985PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

383 So.2d 219 (1980)

Fredford James EUTSEY, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 55985.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 24, 1980.

Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender; and Channing E. Brackey, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Mary E. Marsden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ALDERMAN, Justice.

The imposition of an increased sentence pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1977),[1] Florida's habitual offender act, is before us on direct appeal because the trial court, in imposing an enhanced sentence, upheld the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API