Legal Opinion
Lindgrove v. Schluter & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The first cause of action attempted to be stated makes these allegations:
The plaintiff and the defendant corporation, in October, 1926, entered into a contract, whereby the defendant employed the plaintiff to act as its vice-president, at an annual salary. The employment was to continue until such time as it might be terminated by the arrival of a day fixed for its termination by a three months’ notice served by either party upon the other. The plaintiff was elected vice-president and continued in the performance of his duties as such officer until November 15th, 1927, when the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Flaherty v. CaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Flaherty v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,328 in Re International Business MacHines Corporate Securities Litigation Charles Kowal, Peter R. Herold, Albert Ominsky, Douglas Ominsky, Andrew Ominsky, Steven Horowitz, Dina Horowitz, Joan Howard, Mark Gardy, M.E. Lifshitz, Wai Chinn, Alexander Sands, Donald Lewis, Bruce Murphy, Barnett Stepak, and William Steiner v. International Business MacHines Corporation and Frank A. Metz, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Gordon v. EllimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Hewitt Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Kennedy v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.