Local 2787, AFSCME v. City of Montpelier
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentJohnson, J.
Because I cannot agree with the majority’s inequitable application of the law of waiver, I must respectfully dissent. I find it both unjust and confounding that, on the one hand, the city has preserved its right to bargain despite having committed three separate violations of the collective bargaining agreement; while, on the other hand, the union has waived its right to bargain solely because it insisted that the agreement be enforced.
The majority today affirms the decision of the Vermont Labor Relations Board, which allowed the City of Montpelier unilaterally to implement a payroll…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- School Committee of Newton v. Labor Relations Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Vermont State Colleges Faculty Federation v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In Re Grievance of the Vermont State Colleges Faculty FederationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. City of LuverneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.