Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Eastern Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSocle, J.

This is an action of tort, in which the writ is dated in August, 1877. The declaration alleges in substance that in October, 1874, the defendant corporation was managing a rail road which crossed a certain highway at grade, and had been accustomed and was bound to keep a flagman at the crossing to warn travellers on the highway of the approach of trains on the railroad; that he was driving on the highway, and, because there was no flagman at the crossing, had no reason to suppose a train ' was approaching, and therefore drove near to the crossing, with due care; and the defendant’s train…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norton v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Edes v. BoardmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. ReesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  4. Gately v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. T. & P. R'y Co. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API