Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Jacques Rousso
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 25, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6120Published
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner rejecting, as unpat-entable over the prior art, all of the claims, 1-3 and 6-13, in appellant’s application for a patent on new and useful improvements in a “Method of Handling Towels and Towel Pack Used In Same.”
The references are: Borroughs 2,020,-170, Nov. 5, 1935; Rousso 2,483,153, Sept. 27, 1949.
Claims 1 and 6, drawn to the method, and claim 10 directed to the article, are regarded as representative and are reproduced herewith:
“1. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In re CusterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In Re CresswellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In Re CrowellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.