Legal Opinion

Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. v. University of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 4, 2015No. Case No. 6:14-CV-01295-TCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER. AND OPINION

McSHANE, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 71) and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Both Defendant, the University of Oregon, and Counterclaim-Defendant, Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc., filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. ECF No. 76, 77. Accordingly, I have reviewed this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981). I find no error and adopt the Findings and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Reed v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Equine Legal Solutions, PC v. This Old Horse, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  2. Weishampel v. Circle of ChildrenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API