Legal Opinion

Vanderzanden Farms, LLC v. Dow Agrosciences, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 24, 2004No. CV 03-779-BRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (# 11), Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Documents (#26), Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order (# 25), Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice of EPA’s Position Regarding FIFRA Preemption (#34), and Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Submit Supplemental Authority, Instanter (# 39).

Plaintiff VanderZanden Farms, LLC, is a family farm in Washington County, Oregon, in the business of growing tulips. Plaintiff brings this action against Defen-dánt Dow Agrosciences, LLC, for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Nathan Kimmel, Inc. Nathan Kimmel, LLC Knf Corp., Formerly Known as Kennedy Nylon Film Corp. v. DowelancoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API