Legal Opinion

Gentile Bros. v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 20, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRELL, J.:

Appellant owns and operates a large citrus fruit packing house at Winter Park, Florida. The boxes for shipping its product are purchased “knocked down.” It contracted with appellee, T. H. Hobbs, to assemble and load them on cars when packed. Hobbs employed and paid his own help and was responsible to appellant only as to results. Appellee, Ervin Thomas Sparkman, was employed by Hobbs and becoming unemployed, he applied for compensation under the Unemployment Compensation Act. His claim was denied by the Florida Industrial Commission for lack of earnings in employment. The appeals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McDermott v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Young v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. McKinley, Comm'r of Lab. v. Payne Son Lbr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Florida Industrial Commission v. State Ex Rel. Orange State Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Florida Industrial Comm. v. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Lindsey v. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Seattle Aerie No. 1 of Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Commissioner of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Griswold v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API