Legal Opinion

McDermott v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1938No. 27114. Department OnePublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

— The plaintiff, who conducts a barbershop in the city of Seattle, instituted this action for a declaratory judgment establishing the status of the barbers, manicurists, and bootblacks performing service in his shop under Laws of 1937, chapter 162, p. 574, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 9998-101 [R C. § 6233-301] et seq., known as the Washington unemployment compensation act. The state of Washington, the director of the department of social security, the supervisor of the unemployment compensation division of that department, and the attorney general were made defendants.

The case was tried to the…

2Cited by52 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API