Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

K4C6R, LLC v. Elmore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 2019No. COA18-1008Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDillon, Judge

Plaintiff and Defendant were partners in a partially-developed subdivision, known as Forest Creek.1 Because of a dispute, the parties entered into a division agreement which provided, in relevant part, that each would receive about half of the developed and undeveloped properties in Forest Creek. The division agreement contained a right of first refusal ("ROFR"), to apply to "cash-only sales" of the "undeveloped Forest Creek property." That is, the ROFR granted each party the first right to purchase the other party's undeveloped property in Forest Creek should the other party ever decide to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Normile v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Berry-Iverson Co. of North Dakota, Inc. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Anderson v. Armour & CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. First National Exchange Bank v. Roanoke Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API