Legal Opinion

Lavon v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1979PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider the defendant’s claim that successive prosecutions in state and federal court, predicated on the same act, violated constitutional guarantees against double jeopardy. We hold that they do not.

In December, 1976, the defendant robbed a bank in Hardeman County, Tennessee, at gunpoint. As a result, he was indicted by a federal grand jury for the robbery of a federally insured bank, as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He was also indicted by the Hardeman County grand jury for bank robbery with the use of a firearm, T.C.A. §§…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. People v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. HudsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Michael Dwayne EDWARDS v. STATE of Tennessee, Wayne Brandon, WardenTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. CaliguriWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Fisher v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Evans v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API