Mosley v. Lynn
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The judgment of the court below is erroneous, in that it entirely confuses seduction as a tort, for which damages may be recovered in a proper action, with seduction as a crime, with sentence imposed for the commission of such crime. The definition laid down in the Penal Code, § 378, which imposes a penalty of from one to twenty-years for the offense therein defined, has nothing whatever to do with the seduction of a female child as the basis of an action for damages on the part of the mother under the provisions of the Civil Code, § 4466. It must be borne…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tillotson v. CheethamNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Bartley v. . RichtmyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Breon v. HenkleOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Johnson v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- State ex rel. Byerley v. State Board of CanvassersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allied Productions, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Watson v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Franklin v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Odum v. BergmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Franklin v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.