Legal Opinion

Mosley v. Lynn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1931No. 7788PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The judgment of the court below is erroneous, in that it entirely confuses seduction as a tort, for which damages may be recovered in a proper action, with seduction as a crime, with sentence imposed for the commission of such crime. The definition laid down in the Penal Code, § 378, which imposes a penalty of from one to twenty-years for the offense therein defined, has nothing whatever to do with the seduction of a female child as the basis of an action for damages on the part of the mother under the provisions of the Civil Code, § 4466. It must be borne…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tillotson v. CheethamNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Bartley v. . RichtmyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Breon v. HenkleOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Johnson v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. State ex rel. Byerley v. State Board of CanvassersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allied Productions, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Watson v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Franklin v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Odum v. BergmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Franklin v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API