Franklin v. Hill
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Justice.
This case involves the constitutionality of the state statute that gives parents a cause of action for the seduction of their unmarried daughter. We hold that OCGA § 51-1-16 is a gender-based classification that violates the equal protection clause of the Georgia Constitution because only men may be civilly liable for seduction under the statute.
Nancy Franklin sued her daughter’s former high school teacher, Andrew Hill, seeking damages for Hill’s alleged seduction of the daughter under OCGA § 51-1-16.1 In an earlier appeal, the Georgia *303Court of Appeals held that Franklin…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ambles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Lamar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Rayle Electric Membership Corporation v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- City of Roswell v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rainey v. CheverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Edwards v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Edwards v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Franklin v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Rainey v. CheverSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.