Legal Opinion

Bentel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1926No. 396PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Of the writ taken by Bentel it is almost enough to say that we think it wholly without merit.

There are assignments of error relating to the admission of evidence, concerning which we think the matters complained of were either discretionary with the trial judge, or illustrate the .common complaint of counsel who start an inquiry and feel hurt when opponents pursue the matter to the disadvantage of him that started it.

It is also said to require a new trial that the prosecutor summed up in too forcible, if not a virulent, manner. We see nothing to complain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Horn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Martin Frank, and Nylo-Thane Plastics Corp., Maurice Minuto, Olanda Minuto, Louis Braunston, Leonard FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  5. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API