Legal Opinion
Schnier v. District Court In & For the City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 4, 1985No. 84SA123PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
We issued a rule pursuant to C.A.R. 21 to show cause why the respondent district court should not be prohibited from entering a judgment for $153,000 plus interest in a contempt proceeding held a year after final judgment had been entered in a case decreeing specific performance. We now discharge the rule.
I
Lexicon Resources Corporation (Lexicon) sued R. Ronald Schnier (petitioner) in the *266Denver District Court for specific performance on a contract in which petitioner agreed to buy and Lexicon agreed to sell a number of oil and gas leases. On April 7, 1983, after a bench trial,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State of NY v. Unique IdeasNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Allied Materials Corporation v. Superior Products Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schnier v. DIST. CT., CITY & COUNTY OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985