Hirning v. Dooley
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Milo Hirning filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging four drug convictions. The habeas court denied relief. Hirning appeals on three of the convictions. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] There are three criminal proceedings involving four convictions that were reviewed by the habeas court. Hirn-ing challenges the first, third, and fourth convictions in this appeal.
[¶ 3.] The first conviction arose out of an automobile stop on a Brown County highway. The facts related to this conviction are found in State v. Hirning, 1999 SD 53, 592 N.W.2d 600…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Minks v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Willis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023