Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carr v. International Refining & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 2009No. 1070770Published

1DissentMurdock, J.

SEE, Justice (concurring in overruling the application for rehearing and concurring in the result as to the opinion).

I concur in overruling the application for a rehearing. I concur in the result reached by the main opinion for the following reasons.

I concurred in McKenzie v. Killian, 887 So.2d 861 (Ala.2004), the controlling precedent in this case. Nonetheless, its application in this case is troubling. I concur in the result reached by the main opinion because (1) McKenzie is the current applicable law, (2) I do not believe that McKenzie can be distinguished from this case, and (3) this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lynn Strickland Sales & Serv., Inc. v. AERO-LANE FAB., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. RoushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Griffin Lumber Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Harper v. Winston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API