Legal Opinion

Hoare v. Harris

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1849PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Bill in chancery by Harris against Hoare. Heard at October term, 1849, by Harlan, Judge, on pleadings and proofs. A decree was entered for complainant, to be relieved from which decree, Hoare sued out this writ of error. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Mr. Justice Catón :

Although we are satisfied that this record shows a meritorious case in favor of the wards of the complainant, yet several of the errors are well assigned. The first objection, which goes to the foundation of the whole proceeding, is a want of proper parties, and this objection is well taken. The bill is filed by Harris as guardian, to compel the conveyance of a town lot to his wards: which it is shown is held by the defendant in trust for them; and the decree is, that the conveyance shall be made to the infants. Authorities are hardly required to show that, by…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stanley Stanczyk, Jr., a Minor, by Stanley Stanczyk, Sr., His Father and Next Friend v. William E. KeefeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  2. Swift v. YanawayIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Meek v. AswanHawaii Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Consolidated Stanley Mining & Milling Co. v. LoeberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Behymer v. OdellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API