Legal Opinion

Stanley Stanczyk, Jr., a Minor, by Stanley Stanczyk, Sr., His Father and Next Friend v. William E. Keefe

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 18, 1967No. 16041PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILEY, Circuit Judge.

The district court dismissed, as barred by limitations, this diversity “next friend” suit seeking damages for an injured minor and for his parents’ resulting medical expenses, claims for which had been assigned to the minor. Plaintiff has appealed. We reverse as to the claim of damages for the minor’s injury, and affirm as to his claim as assignee of his parents.

The minor was injured when struck by defendant’s automobile in June, 1951. He was then four years old and was seventeen years old when this suit was filed September 3, 1964. He claimed damages for his injuries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waechter v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Skaggs v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Desiron v. PelozaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. McManmon v. SheehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  5. Hoare v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1970
  2. Eiseman v. LernerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Gookin v. NorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. Paju Ex Rel. Paju v. RickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Robert Earley, by and Through His Father and Next Friend, Charles Earley v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., a Corporation, and Jimmy DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API