State v. Jackson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.
lain this criminal matter, defendant/appellant, Mr. Jackson’s appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw with accompanying brief stating that no non-frivolous issues exist which arguably support an appeal. After an independent review of the record, we agree that no non-frivolous issues exist. Therefore, Mr. Jackson’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. The case is remanded to the district court for the correction of an error patent.
Facts and Procedural History
On January 27, 2009, defendant/appellant, Mr. Craig Jackson, was charged by bill of information…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. JylesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Roland v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mader, S., Aplt. v. Duquesne LightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020