Legal Opinion
State v. Inabnitt
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1991No. CA-12737PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Judge.
The state of Ohio appeals, pursuant to Crim.R. 12(J), from an order of the trial court suppressing evidence obtained in the course of the investigation and arrest of appellee Inabnitt for an alleged violation of R.C. 2925.22(A), procuring by deception the administration of, prescription for, or the dispensing of a dangerous drug, for which appellee was indicted. We overrule the assigned error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I
On December 6, 1990, at approximately 12:25 p.m., Officer Thomas Heck of the Centerville Police Department received a radio report that two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. VenhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. CurtisOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. MaitlandOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.