Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1987No. 44304PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Presiding Justice.

This is a condemnation case in which we granted the condemnee’s application to appeal an interlocutory order denying his motion in limine. The issue is whether the condemnee can present evidence to show that the condemnation of a temporary construction easement caused consequential damages. The trial court followed the cases of the appellate courts in Georgia and held that the condemnee could not show diminution in the market or rental value of the remainder property on the date of taking.

The condemnee, Mr. Hillman, contends that the rule disallowing consequential…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Tift County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DatrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Department of Transportation v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Department of Transportation v. DentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. Hillside Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Buck's Service Station, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  3. Department of Transportation v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Buck's Service Station, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Hendrix v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API