Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1988No. 76720PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

George L. Hendrix appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the Department of Transportation (DOT) in his suit seeking compensation for an alleged inverse condemnation of his land and damage to his business. The undisputed facts before the trial court were as follows:

The property owned by Hendrix on which his business is operated is located on a county road approximately six-tenths of a mile east of a bridge across Horse Creek. Another bridge on this road crosses the Ogeechee River approximately four-tenths of a mile west of the Horse Creek bridge. After DOT…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Price v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Department of Transportation v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Powell v. Ledbetter Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. C. F. I. Construction Co. v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. Hillside Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Remax the Mountain Co. v. Tabsum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Department of Transportation v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Department of Transportation v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Department of Transportation v. Hillside Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API