Legal Opinion

Shuey v. Shearman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1954No. 5834PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether a complaint to recover on a contract for drilling a water well on agricultural land to be used for agricultural purposes must allege the driller possessed a contractor’s license, in order to state a claim for relief.

Glenn L. Shuey, plaintiff-appellant, brought a civil action against J. K. Shear-man, defendant-appellee, to recover the reasonable value of services rendered pursuant to a contract between them, in connection with drilling a water well to he used for agricultural purposes on defendant’s lands. Defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northen v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fraenkel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Irvine Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Kelly v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Bowline v. GriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salter v. Kindom Uranium CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Dixon v. FefferArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Salter v. Kindom Uranium CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API