Legal Opinion

People v. Stevens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Exceptions from Muskegon. Information for burglary. Respondent was convicted.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The defendant was informed against, jointly with one Lyons, for a statutory burglary alleged to have been committed in the shop of one "Woodward in Whitehall. The two were put on trial together, but before the trial was completed Lyons fully admitted his own guilt in open court and ofEered to withdraw his plea of not guilty. As to Stevens, the theory of the prosecution was that he did not personally participate in the breaking, but was present outside, aiding and abetting while Lyons entered.

In his instructions to the jury the circuit judge made use of tbe following language: “About this man…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. State v. BowkerOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. SlighMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. SartoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API