Legal Opinion
Kascewicz v. Citibank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 23, 1993No. 92 Civ. 257 (LBS)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
This is an action for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (hereinafter “ERISA”). Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) moves for summary judgment on the claims of plaintiff Alan Kascewiez (“Kascew-icz”) for benefits and statutory penalties. Kascewiez cross-moves for partial summary judgment on his claim for statutory penalties. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Citibank’s summary judgment motion and grant Kascewicz’s motion for partial summary judgment.
I. Undisputed, Facts
The essential facts in this case are…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- David T. Thompson and Thompson Communications Companies, Inc. v. Davor G. GjivojeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lacoparra v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Davis v. FeatherstoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Pagovich v. MoskowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Davis v. FeatherstoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Man Yoon v. Fordham University Faculty And Administrative Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.